Between a Rock and a Hard Place

Thomas Fleming

By

January 12, 2018

Question:  Is everyone angry with Trump for using the vulgar language we hear everyday on the street or for telling the plain truth about Haiti.  I have even heard American blacks refer contemptuously to "Hessians"--and they were not talking about German mercenaries in the American Revolution.   I suppose there must be some place with more hapless, dependent, filthy, and violent people, but none with a history like Haiti's.  It took a witchdoctor like Papa Doc Duvalier to impose any order, and these days all they seem to be doing is to lie around waiting for another hurricane to give them one more excuse to be losers, one more claim on American tax dollars.  If just a few Americans would read anything about the history of this horrible country--even a Kenneth Roberts' novel--they would understand Trump's exasperation.

Does that justify the language he allegedly used?  Of course not.  He ought to know better and did perhaps 10 to 20 years ago.  But the President lives in the here and now, when the F-word is used regularly on television, and when porn stars are honored with Oscars.

Don't you feel sometimes that you got dropped in from another planet called The Real World?

*     *     *     *     *

Many years ago I started, with the help of Clyde Wilson, a quarterly called The Southern Partisan Quarterly Review.  Like every other project of Quixotic idealism, it was taken over by well-meaning mediocrities who had not the slightest idea of what we were trying to do but were convinced that they could find some way to instrumentalize our sincere efforts to serve their own limited purposes:  elect the right candidates, raise money, generate what they imagined to be "influence."

At the Partisan--oh, just a sidenote that the law is finally catching up with the Republican PR guy to whom we entrusted our baby--I did a few columns under the rubric of "Between a Rock and a Hard Place."   Sam Francis thought it was too common an expression.  Perhaps he also thought it was too pessimistic.  Like so many political cynics, Sam was also a hopeless optimist, forever dreaming of the Middle American Revolution that would throw off the shackles, break free of the fetters imposed on the American people by an unprincipled ruling class that refused to see that it was destroying itself along with the country.

Sam was a long-term pessimist and short-term optimist.  I have always been the reverse.  The age we live in is a sinkhole of trashy imbecility, but it has not been ever thus and some day, perhaps some day before the Second Coming, there will be people on this planet who do more than eat, drink, and stare at screens.

Our earth is a little big like the planet in a terrible science fiction movie I once watched on an airplane.  The hilarious comic actor Vin Diesel is stuck on a planet with a few companions, and they realize that a long period of darkness is about to fall, and when it comes, they will be assaulted by terrifying raptors.  Of course, when darkness comes, there is the consolation that if one learns to survive it, the day will come when the sun shines again.  I won't see it, you won't see it, our grandchildren probably won't see it, but it will happen.  And, the only thing we can do to hasten that day is to keep on doing the right thing, day after day, preserving and handing down what has been given to us, redimentes tempus quoniam dies mali sunt.

All this is preface, first to my apology for commenting very little on the passing scene.  Christmas festivities, which this year included the extended visit of son Garret, and a belated Christmas present (a cold) have limited my time for work.  To make matter worse, I have undertaken two very time-consuming projects, one of which is to revise and amplify my little book on Montenegro.   Second, I hope to be able to produce more regularly a series of rather short pieces on the passing scene.  Hence this discourse on the new rubric....

Thomas Fleming

Thomas Fleming

Thomas Fleming is president of the Fleming Foundation. He is the author of six books, including The Morality of Everyday Life and The Politics of Human Nature, as well as many articles and columns for newspapers, magazines,and learned journals. He holds a Ph.D. in Classics from the University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill and a B.A. in Greek from the College of Charleston. He served as editor of Chronicles: a Magazine of American Culture from 1984 to 2015 and president of The Rockford Institute from 1997-2014. In a previous life he taught classics at several colleges and served as a school headmaster in South Carolina

4 Responses

  1. James D. says:

    “an unprincipled ruling class that refused to see that it was destroying itself along with the country.”

    The WASP elite agitates for birth control. They get what they want and then cease to exist. It seems to me that the ruling class now knows it is destroying the country and is heartened with their progress because that is their goal.

  2. Robert Peters says:

    The radical liberals and near Marxists in the State Department plot to overthrow the governments of the hapless peoples in these countries, alleging that they are corrupt and “undemocratic.”

    The NGO’s spend billions to convince us that these countries need all sorts of interventions, American money enriching the governments the State Department wants to overthrow.

    Not-for-profits ply their faux charity in the millions to that we can virtue signal from our armchairs with donations, playing our emotions with photos of emaciated children held by movie stars flown in for the photo op.

    Agencies of the UN document, again angling for U.S. dollars, sex slavery, prostitution, disease and murder squads in these countries.

    Do gooders cite the egregious injustices in these countries, making their case that the best “citizens” of these benighted countries be allowed a free pass into our country so that they can become our “worst” residents, abandoning their fellow countrymen to the abysmal existence, the equivalent of “those left behind” in the heresy of the rapture.

    So, what does President Trump do? He considers what the State Department has alleged, what the NGO’s have alleged, what the charity scams have alleged and what the do gooders have alleged, aggregates their allegations, and accurately describes the picture their allegations have painted by overthrowing genteel Norman terms and accurately describing the conditions in good basic Saxon.

    Hengist and Horsa would appreciate that. So would the non-Enlightened side of Jefferson.

  3. Thomas Fleming Thomas Fleming says:

    Thanks, Robert, and to my thanks I add my plea that you write more for us/

  1. January 15, 2018

    […] I posted my comments about Trump on Facebook, some "friends" seemed to think that I was endorsing or defending his language.  I […]