Iran War SitRep: Day 9: Pro-War Wall Street Journal shows war not going well for Trump
The Wall Street Journal’s editorial page is neocon and obsessively pro-war. They pushed the Iran War as much as any publication.
The Wall Street Journal’s editorial page is neocon and obsessively pro-war. They pushed the Iran War as much as any publication.
“War reveals” is my guiding insight for the Iran War. Let’s see what we have discovered the past week.
The one person in America, after President Trump, most identified with “no regime-change wars” is Tulsi Gabbard. Now that Trump has launched the ultimate regime-change war, Tulsi needs to resign in protest.
We’ll know more in a couple of days. But here’s one result from yesterday’s elections around Trumpland. Someone named Mel tweeted: “Voter turnout is in the toilet for Republicans.” R+7 = Republican 7-point registration advantage.
The body bags are starting to come home from Trump’s Iran War. Your sons and daughters, or those of your friends, relatives and neighbors. Once again: Rich man’s war, poor man’s fight. Why isn’t Barron Trump fighting?
Since the 9/11 attack in 2001, one of the worst things the U.S. government did to diminish our liberties was impose the Department of Homeland Security and give it that name.
What we see all around us—the polarization, the growing threat of civil conflict and global war—will culminate by the early 2030s in a climax that poses great danger and yet also holds great promise, perhaps even bringing on America’s next golden age.
The way things have been going in this country, for the LX’th Super Bowl’s halftime entertainment, I was expecting Jeffrey Epstein, not “Epstein’d” but alive, to walk out to midfield and perform a human sacrifice.